The Blog

Unprecedented and Unyielding: The Political Fallout of Trump’s Guilty Verdict

By Joseph Vambe

The guilty verdict against former US President Donald Trump represents a significant turning point in American politics, with profound implications for both the domestic political landscape and the international perception of the United States. As the first former president to be convicted of a crime, Trump’s conviction on 34 counts of falsifying business records has sparked intense debate and speculation about its impact on the 2024 Presidential election and beyond. 

To understand the gravity of the situation, it is essential to examine the details of Trump’s actions and the circumstances that led to his conviction. The case against Trump centred on a scheme to cover up “hush money” payments made to adult film star Stormy Daniels. Daniels claimed that she had a sexual encounter with Trump in 2006, and as Trump was running for president in 2016, she sought to sell her story. To prevent this potentially damaging information from becoming public, Trump directed his lawyer, Michael Cohen, to pay Daniels $130,000 to remain silent. This payment, while not illegal in itself, was falsely recorded as legal expenses in Trump’s business records, which constitutes the crime of falsifying business records. 

During the trial, Cohen testified that he made the payment at Trump’s direction and was later reimbursed through a series of checks from Trump’s personal account, disguised as legal fees. The prosecution argued that this was part of a broader effort to conceal information from voters that could have influenced the outcome of the 2016 election, thereby constituting election fraud. The jury found Trump guilty on all counts, marking a historic first in American history. 

Domestically, the immediate effect of Trump’s conviction has been a mixed bag. Polls indicate a slight narrowing of Trump’s lead over President Joe Biden. Prior to the conviction, Trump held a three-point advantage, but this has since dwindled to a razor-thin margin. This shift suggests that while some voters are swayed by the guilty verdict, many remain steadfast in their support. Notably, the demographic of “double haters” – voters who dislike both candidates – has shown a significant shift, with a fifth of this group moving away from Trump. This demographic has been pivotal in recent elections, and their movement could signal trouble for Trump’s campaign. 

However, the conviction has also galvanised a segment of Trump’s base. Reports indicate a surge in campaign donations following the verdict, with claims of $200 million raised since the jury’s decision. This influx of support underscores a paradox in American politics: a criminal conviction, which would typically end a political career in other stable democracies, appears to have bolstered Trump’s standing among his most ardent supporters. This phenomenon is partly attributable to the deep polarisation that currently defines US politics. For many Republicans, particularly those aligned with the “MAGA” movement, the conviction is seen less as a mark of guilt and more as evidence of a politically motivated attack on their leader.  

The polarisation in the US is stark. Many Trump supporters believe he is being unfairly targeted, viewing the conviction as part of a broader conspiracy to undermine his political influence. This belief is fuelled by Trump’s own rhetoric, where he has repeatedly decried the trial as “rigged” and the judge as “highly conflicted.” Such sentiments have found fertile ground among his base, further entrenching the divisions within American society. 

From a legal perspective, Trump is unlikely to be barred from standing for President. The US Constitution sets out specific eligibility criteria for presidential candidates, none of which include a prohibition on felons running for office. This legal reality means that despite the conviction, Trump remains a viable candidate for the 2024 election. However, the political and public opinion ramifications are another matter. Polls show that a significant portion of independent voters and even some Republicans believe Trump should drop out of the race following his conviction. Yet, a considerable number of his supporters remain undeterred, if not more resolved, to see him back in the Oval Office. 

The broader implications of Trump’s conviction extend beyond the borders of the United States. Internationally, the spectacle of a former US president being convicted and continuing to run for office paints a troubling picture of American democracy. Allies and adversaries alike are watching closely. In Europe, the conviction has elicited concern about the stability and predictability of US politics. Meanwhile, in countries with ongoing conflicts, such as the occupied Palestinian territories and Ukraine, the US’s internal turmoil could be perceived as a weakening of its global leadership. 

For Russia and other adversarial states, the conviction provides ammunition to criticise the US political system, potentially undermining its moral authority on the global stage. The situation in Ukraine, where US support is crucial, could be particularly affected if Trump’s legal battles distract from or diminish US foreign policy efforts.  

The conviction also raises questions about the future of American democracy and its electoral integrity. The notion that a presidential candidate could be convicted of a crime and yet remain a serious contender for the highest office in the land is unprecedented. It challenges the very foundations of democratic norms and the rule of law. In many other democracies, such a conviction would almost certainly disqualify a candidate from running for office, reflecting a clear standard of accountability and ethical conduct. The fact that Trump remains a viable candidate speaks volumes about the current state of American politics and the deep divisions within the electorate. 

Moreover, the conviction has significant implications for the Republican Party. The party is now faced with a dilemma: continue to back Trump despite his legal troubles or distance itself from him and risk alienating his substantial base of support. This decision will shape the future direction of the party and its identity. If the party chooses to stand by Trump, it risks further entrenching the polarisation within the US and potentially alienating moderate and independent voters. On the other hand, distancing itself from Trump could lead to internal fractures and the rise of new factions within the party. 

Trump’s conviction also highlights the broader issue of accountability for political leaders. The trial and subsequent conviction serve as a reminder that no one is above the law, a fundamental principle of democratic governance. However, the political fallout and the reactions from various segments of the electorate suggest that this principle is being tested in unprecedented ways. The trial has not only been a legal proceeding but also a political spectacle, with both sides leveraging the case to advance their narratives and mobilise their bases. 

Looking ahead, the political landscape in the US is likely to remain tumultuous. Trump’s legal battles are far from over, with potential appeals and other pending investigations that could further complicate the political dynamics. As the election approaches, the focus will undoubtedly remain on how these legal issues influence voter perceptions and behaviour. The ultimate impact of the conviction will be determined by the electorate in November, and the outcome will have lasting implications for American democracy and its role on the global stage. 

In conclusion, Donald Trump’s guilty verdict signifies more than just a legal decision; it is a reflection of the deep-seated divisions within American society and a test of the resilience of its democratic institutions. As the US navigates this unprecedented political terrain, the world watches with a mix of concern and anticipation, aware that the repercussions of this moment will reverberate far beyond November 2024. The conviction has not only challenged the norms of political candidacy in the US but has also highlighted the intense polarisation that could shape the future of American and global politics. The coming months will be critical in determining whether the US can uphold its democratic principles and emerge stronger from this period of political and legal turmoil. 

Join TEA! Let's shape the financial inclusion agenda together by facilitating inclusive investor engagement. Sign up now for FREE!

Sign up to our newsletter to stay up to date